Search

Thinx, Inc. to Settle PFAS/PFOA Lawsuit

$ 16.99 · 4.5 (200) · In stock

In late January, Thinx, Inc. announced that it had reached a $5 million settlement agreement to end Dickens v. Thinx, Inc., a class action perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS/PFOA) lawsuit. Thinx will provide up to $5 million to reimburse consumers who bought the company’s signature period underwear between November 12, 2016 and November 28, 2022. To put this in perspective, reimbursements are limited to $7.00 per pair (up to 3 pairs) for consumers who still have receipts and $3.50 per pair (same limit) for those who do not. The initial purchase price of these undies runs up to $35.00 per pair.

The Thinx Period Lawsuit Gave Customers $21 Each and a Lot of Unanswered Questions

Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR

The new generation of 'forever chemicals' – toxicity, exposure, contamination and regulation

Did The Period Positivity Movement Change Anything?

PFAS Lawsuit: $12.5 Billion 3M PFAS Contamination Settlement

PFAS Lawsuit Maxwell Law Group

Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post

PFAS Archives - The National Law Forum

The Race to Waterproof Outdoor Gear — Without Toxic Chemicals

What the Thinx Class Action Settlement Means for All of Us

PFAS in period underwear: The Thinx scandal – Mme L'Ovary

PFAS In Your Water San Diego Water Problems

PFAS in clothing: Is what you wear dripping in forever chemicals? - CBS News

Numerous health studies show that PFAS cause various illnesses

Thinx Period Underwear Has Settled in a Lawsuit Over Harmful Chemicals & Twitter Has Thoughts