Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

/cms/10.2217/fca-2020-0065/a

Dual Suture Versus Suture and Plug Closure Devices for Large Bore Access Haemostasis During Percutaneous Access Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

TAVR股动脉入路：这一组合比2把缝合器效果更好_医学界-助力医生临床决策和职业成长

Procedural and in-hospital outcomes stratified by Perclose±Angio-Seal.

JCDD, Free Full-Text

Dual Suture Versus Suture and Plug Closure Devices for Large Bore Access Haemostasis During Percutaneous Access Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials on the Safety of Vascular Closure Devices for Femoral Arterial Puncture Site Haemostasis

Jocelyn Hudson, Author at Interventional News

Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide

STEP Study: A Randomized Trial Comparing Polymer Versus Suture-Based Vascular Closure Devices for Arterial Closure Following Lower-Limb Arterial Endovascular Revascularization

Frontiers A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution to current eminence