Thinx period underwear lawsuit over PFAS settles for $4 million
$ 17.50 · 4.9 (80) · In stock
Thinx, the first and arguably most well-known brand on the market, was sued for allegedly having toxic chemicals in their period underwear.
Thinx Settled a Lawsuit Claiming Its Period Underwear Contains Potentially Harmful Chemicals
Additives in processed meats linked to type 2 diabetes, study finds
Period Underwear in Singapore: Exploring the Risks of PFAS
PFAS Class-Action Thinx Period Underwear Lawsuit Settled for $5 Million
Thinx will cut 95 workers by May 1 following $5M class-action settlement
thinx Cheap Sell - OFF 63%
Let's talk about period toxicity are our knickers safe?? - Knicked Australia
Thinx to pay up to $5 million to settle claims its period underwear contained potentially harmful chemicals
UV nail polish dryers damaging to human cells, study finds
Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS
Non Toxic Alternatives To Thinx Period Underwear (Without PFAS)
An important class action lawsuit to be aware of regarding period unde