Search

Thinx period underwear lawsuit over PFAS settles for $4 million

$ 17.50 · 4.9 (80) · In stock

Thinx, the first and arguably most well-known brand on the market, was sued for allegedly having toxic chemicals in their period underwear.

Thinx Settled a Lawsuit Claiming Its Period Underwear Contains Potentially Harmful Chemicals

Additives in processed meats linked to type 2 diabetes, study finds

Period Underwear in Singapore: Exploring the Risks of PFAS

PFAS Class-Action Thinx Period Underwear Lawsuit Settled for $5 Million

Thinx will cut 95 workers by May 1 following $5M class-action settlement

thinx Cheap Sell - OFF 63%

Let's talk about period toxicity are our knickers safe?? - Knicked Australia

Thinx to pay up to $5 million to settle claims its period underwear contained potentially harmful chemicals

UV nail polish dryers damaging to human cells, study finds

Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS

Non Toxic Alternatives To Thinx Period Underwear (Without PFAS)

An important class action lawsuit to be aware of regarding period unde