Search

Improving prediction of human behavior using behavior

$ 15.99 · 4.7 (519) · In stock

The derivation elucidates the implications of behavior modification to data scientists, platforms, their clients, and the humans whose behavior is manipulated, and decomposes the expected prediction error given behavior modification. The fields of statistics and machine learning design algorithms, models, and approaches to improve prediction. Larger and richer behavioral data increase predictive power, as evident from recent advances in behavioral prediction technology. Large internet platforms that collect behavioral big data predict user behavior for internal purposes and for third parties (advertisers, insurers, security forces, political consulting firms) who utilize the predictions for personalization, targeting and other decision-making. While standard data collection and modeling efforts are directed at improving predicted values, internet platforms can minimize prediction error by "pushing" users' actions towards their predicted values using behavior modification techniques. The better the platform can make users conform to their predicted outcomes, the more it can boast its predictive accuracy and ability to induce behavior change. Hence, platforms are strongly incentivized to "make predictions true". This strategy is absent from the ML and statistics literature. Investigating its properties requires incorporating causal notation into the correlation-based predictive environment---an integration currently missing. To tackle this void, we integrate Pearl's causal do(.) operator into the predictive framework. We then decompose the expected prediction error given behavior modification, and identify the components impacting predictive power. Our derivation elucidates the implications of such behavior modification to data scientists, platforms, their clients, and the humans whose behavior is manipulated. Behavior modification can make users' behavior more predictable and even more homogeneous; yet this apparent predictability might not generalize when clients use predictions in practice. Outcomes pushed towards their predictions can be at odds with clients' intentions, and harmful to manipulated users.

How to “improve” prediction using behavior modification - ScienceDirect

Ali Tafti on LinkedIn: I'm excited to share that a joint paper with Galit Shmueli, How to…

Improving” prediction of human behavior using behavior modification

Predicting students' performance in e-learning using learning process and behaviour data

Understanding and Predicting Human Behavior for Social Communities

Wrestling Prediction Error: Better Predictions or Better Actuals?

Galit SHMUELI, Professor (Full), PhD, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, NTHU, Institute of Service Science

Machine Learning NeEDS Mathematical Optimization – Branding of OR in AI with the Support of EURO

PDF) Digital health promotion: promise and peril

Galit SHMUELI, Professor (Full), PhD, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, NTHU, Institute of Service Science

Module 1 - Introduction To Human Behaviour in Organizations, PDF, Organizational Behavior

Our weird behavior during the pandemic is messing with AI models

Galit Shmueli: Improving prediction of human behavior using behavior modification